The Angel and the Wing on Melencolia I, the rest of the plate faded
agents

The Angel and the Wing

wings, the angel


The mark of an errand rather than a nature. Note whether the wings are open, folded, or given to the figure by someone else.


Seventeen works here carry a wing, more than any other motif in the archive, and they do not agree about what a wing is.

In the Apocalypse a wing is issued rather than owned. Of the woman driven into the desert the text says “And there were given to the woman two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the desert”, and the passive voice is the whole of it. The wings arrive from outside, for one journey, and the sentence never says she keeps them. The coloured etching of 1772 by Molinier, after the figures attributed to Flamel, sets them at her shoulders and nothing else on the sheet accounts for them.

Where a wing does belong to the figure it marks an office rather than a nature. Michael has wings because he is fighting: “Michael and his angels fought with the dragon”. Blake's angel of the tenth chapter has them because he has been sent. Waite, writing about the angel Pamela Colman Smith drew for Temperance in 1909, refuses to fix what the figure even is: “I speak of him in the masculine sense, but the figure is neither male nor female.” The wing is what the messenger carries, not what the messenger is.

Then there is the case where the wing does not work. Melencolia I, cut by Dürer in 1514, gives its seated figure a pair and she does not use them. Conway's reading is the one the archive holds: “The great genius with her mighty wings sits there, wrapt in thought.” A folded wing is a capacity not taken up, and that is most of what the print is arguing.

One thing is visible and unexplained. Twice Dürer put angels into scenes whose text has none, over the horsemen of the sixth chapter and above the woman of the twelfth. Nobody in the archive accounts for that, and both records say so rather than guessing.

Conway is a scholar reading the prints long afterwards, not Dürer explaining himself, and Melencolia I carries no statement of its own beyond the banner. Two of the seventeen works are marked here as observed and left unread. Hall's caption for the Cherub of Ezekiel is a transcription that has not been checked against a printed folio.
  1. The Apocalypse of Saint John, Douay Rheims, Challoner revision, : Quoted from the Challoner revision, the English text the archive uses for the Apocalypse throughout.
  2. William Martin Conway, Literary Remains of Albrecht Durer, : Conway's translations and commentary. A nineteenth-century scholar reading the prints, not Durer explaining himself.
  3. Arthur Edward Waite, The Pictorial Key to the Tarot, : Waite commissioned the 1909 designs and wrote the key to them, so his account is the closest thing the deck has to an author's statement.
  4. Manly P. Hall, The Secret Teachings of All Ages, : Hall's text and plate captions, 1928. Transcribed here, not yet read against a printed folio.

Plates that carry the symbol, tagged by eye and not yet decoded: first where it is the central motif, then where it plays a secondary part. Each opens in the viewer; the key and the notes come with the entry.

Central motif · 6

Secondary motif · 11