The Serpent and the Dragon on Saint Michael Fighting the Dragon, the rest of the plate faded
agents

The Serpent and the Dragon

the dragon, the old serpent


A single creature doing two opposite jobs. Note whether it is bound, killed, or eating itself.


Twelve works here carry a serpent, and the archive can show the same animal being used for two flatly opposed purposes.

In the Apocalypse it is the enemy and it is named as one: “And there was seen another sign in heaven. And behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns and on his heads seven diadems.” Later the same text collapses four names into one creature: “And that great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, who seduceth the whole world.” That verse is why a picture can put a dragon and a chained serpent on the same sheet and mean one thing by both, which is what the painter of the king with three crowns has done.

Dürer's woodcuts follow the text exactly. The dragon fights on both sides of Michael in the sheet of 1511, and the seven crowned heads appear again beside the woman clothed with the sun.

The other use is not an enemy at all. On the Magician of 1909 the serpent is worn: Waite describes “About his waist is a serpent-cincture, the serpent appearing to devour its own tail”, and the creature has become a belt, a closed system, a thing the figure has mastered rather than fought. In the Abraxas plate the serpents are structural. Hall quotes a reading in which they are “the two supporters, Nous and Logos, expressed in the serpents”, so the legs of the god are made of the animal that elsewhere is the adversary.

That contradiction is the entry. A serpent is not good or evil in this material. It is whatever the picture has decided to do with a thing that renews itself and has no limbs. See also the ouroboros, which is the same creature turned into a diagram.

The sentence about Nous and Logos reaches the archive at second hand: Hall is quoting another author in his own book. Two of the twelve works carry a serpent that no source in the archive explains, the fire-breathing beast on the Flamel sheet and the snakes in Death's hair on the Knight, and both are recorded as observed rather than read.
  1. The Apocalypse of Saint John, Douay Rheims, Challoner revision, : Quoted from the Challoner revision, the English text the archive uses for the Apocalypse throughout.
  2. Arthur Edward Waite, The Pictorial Key to the Tarot, : Waite commissioned the 1909 designs and wrote the key to them, so his account is the closest thing the deck has to an author's statement.
  3. Manly P. Hall, The Secret Teachings of All Ages, : Hall's text and plate captions, 1928. Transcribed here, not yet read against a printed folio.
  4. William Martin Conway, Literary Remains of Albrecht Durer, : Conway's translations and commentary. A nineteenth-century scholar reading the prints, not Durer explaining himself.

Plates that carry the symbol, tagged by eye and not yet decoded: first where it is the central motif, then where it plays a secondary part. Each opens in the viewer; the key and the notes come with the entry.

Central motif · 6

Secondary motif · 9