Rivers in the Wilderness, with Serpents and Fire

Rivers in the Wilderness, with Serpents and Fire

The Serpent and the Dragon as the central motif, with the Water and Fire in a secondary part. From The Flamel figures.

Tap a motif on the picture, or a line below. Its note opens under the line, with the reading its author gave it.

  1. Primary motif
  2. Secondary motifs · 2

Seven pale streams come down a bare tawny slope; more than twenty small banded serpents swim in them and lie on the ground between them; eight dark rosettes with red and white tongues sit at the heads of the streams; one green bush at the foot, and nothing else in the landscape. By eye

The picture read whole, in the archive's words, from the sources quoted on the marks. Read on, and the picture follows: the motif under discussion keeps its colour.

Flamel counts the leaves of the book before he describes any of them, and the count is the point. Thrice seven, numbered in the top corner, and every seventh leaf had no writing on it at all. Three leaves in twenty-one carried a picture and nothing else. This sheet is the last of the three.

On the last of them, he says, were painted “Desarts, or Wildernesses, in the middest whereof ran many faire fountaines”. Taken at his word, that is a slope with nothing on it, and a slope with nothing on it is what the engraver drew: no town, no figure, no path, seven pale streams coming down bare tawny ground, and one small green bush at the bottom left that is the only living thing in the picture.

Out of the fountains, he goes on, “there issued out a number of Serpents, which ran vp and downe here and there.” Count them: more than twenty, banded blue and yellow, some swimming and some on the dry ground between the streams, and they are the only movement in the scene. That is the one clause in the whole sentence describing an action, and it is the clause the sheet spends most of its ink on.

Eight dark rosettes with red and white tongues sit at the heads of the streams, and the museum's title for the sheet calls them fire. Each one sits exactly where a stream begins, which would make them the fountains rather than anything burning. Flamel's sentence gives no help either way, so both readings stand on the page and neither is settled.

Two of the seventh leaves are missing from this run and are worth knowing anyway. On the first, Flamel says, was painted “a Virgin, and Serpents swallowing her vp”; on the second, “a Crosse where a Serpent was crucified”. Wellcome holds a crowned woman in glory with the beasts beaten at her feet, filed here under the twelfth chapter of the Apocalypse, which is where her details actually come from. Somewhere between Flamel's sentence and that sheet, the serpents stopped winning.

Decoded: every motif is marked, and each mark carries the reading its author gave it, quoted from the text, or says that it is observed on the picture and not read. The reading above is the archive's own, made from those sources and no others.

Record

Source
Rights
Public Domain Mark. Wellcome Collection marks the work as free of known copyright restrictions.
Restoration
None. A 1006 by 1400 pixel web copy made from the source file; nothing painted, nothing upscaled.
Series
Titled here
Rivers in the Wilderness, with Serpents and Fire. Wellcome Collection catalogues it as: Rivers running in the wilderness, with serpents and fire between them; representing the stage of 'multiplication' in the alchemical process. Coloured etching after etching, ca. 17th century.
Checked
Wellcome Collection's own catalogue record, 4 September 2026: the rights, the maker, the date, accession dgqmayuk. The title on this page is ours, as the line above says. Not seen in the gallery. Flamel's sentence for this sheet was read against the page images of the Wellcome Library's copy of the 1624 London printing on the Internet Archive, item b30334767, pages 7 and 8; the leaf index runs nineteen ahead of the book. work/wellcome/decode.py, 4 September, tested the eleven sheets the archive then held against Flamel's descriptions and found none of them showed the figures he describes; that finding stands for those eleven. This sheet was among them and was left unread; the three sheets that carry the figures Flamel describes were found on 10 September and are filed beside it. Flamel's sentence for this sheet was read against the page images of the Wellcome Library's copy of the 1624 London printing on the Internet Archive, item b30334767, pages 7 and 8; the leaf index runs nineteen ahead of the book. work/wellcome/decode.py, 4 September, tested the eleven sheets the archive then held against Flamel's descriptions and found none of them showed the figures he describes; that finding stands for those eleven. This sheet was among them and was left unread; the three sheets that carry the figures Flamel describes were found on 10 September and are filed beside it. Flamel's sentence for this sheet was read against the page images of the Wellcome Library's copy of the 1624 London printing on the Internet Archive, item b30334767, pages 7 and 8; the leaf index runs nineteen ahead of the book. work/wellcome/decode.py, 4 September, tested the eleven sheets the archive then held against Flamel's descriptions and found none of them showed the figures he describes; that finding stands for those eleven. This sheet was among them and was left unread; the three sheets that carry the figures Flamel describes were found on 10 September and are filed beside it.
By email · free

One symbol a week, decoded.

This picture is free at full size from its source, linked above. What an address gets is the Sunday letter: one picture, one symbol marked on it, what it meant and who said so, and the master files of the decoded plates as they are verified. Leave any time.

Cite
Symbolica, “Rivers in the Wilderness, with Serpents and Fire”, From the figures attributed to Nicolas Flamel, hand-coloured, date not recorded. thesymbolica.com/work/rivers-in-the-wilderness-with-serpents-and-fire/