Death and the Skull on Knight, Death, and the Devil, the rest of the plate faded
stages

Death and the Skull

the skeleton, the reaper


An office, not an ending. Note what Death is holding and who is being made to look at it.


Only two works here carry Death, and between them they hold the whole argument.

The Apocalypse gives the figure a name and a mount and nothing else: “And behold a pale horse: and he that sat upon him, his name was Death. And hell followed him.” That is a sentence about office. Death is a rider with a job, and the text does not describe his face.

Dürer's engraving of 1513 makes the job specific. Death rides at the knight's left hand and holds up an hourglass, and Conway's reading is the one the archive holds: “Death turns round at the knight, holding up the hour-glass to his view: not in malice, not in wrath, but in sad and solemn warning.” The glass is the point. Death in this print is not attacking, he is informing, and the knight rides on without turning his head.

Pamela Colman Smith's card of 1909 keeps the office and drops the malice further still. Waite: “The horseman carries no visible weapon, but king and child and maiden fall before him, while a prelate with clasped hands awaits his end.” No weapon, and the ranks of the world fall anyway. The banner he carries is not a death's head but a rose.

What both pictures refuse is the reading a modern eye brings, that Death is the villain. In this material he is closer to a functionary of time, and the skull under the roots of Dürer's plate is a fact left lying about rather than a threat.

Two works is a thin base and the entry should be read as thin. Conway is reading the print long after it was cut. The snakes in Death's hair on the Dürer are marked here as observed: Conway reads Death and the hourglass and does not name them.
  1. The Apocalypse of Saint John, Douay Rheims, Challoner revision, : Quoted from the Challoner revision, the English text the archive uses for the Apocalypse throughout.
  2. William Martin Conway, Literary Remains of Albrecht Durer, : Conway's translations and commentary. A nineteenth-century scholar reading the prints, not Durer explaining himself.
  3. Arthur Edward Waite, The Pictorial Key to the Tarot, : Waite commissioned the 1909 designs and wrote the key to them, so his account is the closest thing the deck has to an author's statement.

Plates that carry the symbol, tagged by eye and not yet decoded: first where it is the central motif, then where it plays a secondary part. Each opens in the viewer; the key and the notes come with the entry.

Central motif · 6

Secondary motif · 3